altcunningham
Hooker with a heart of gold
Wire will be way more fun than a pre-posed plastic crazy straw.
Plus, the value is definitely not there in most of these EMPTY packages. Lots of re-use (not new), not a lot of accessories, named and notable characters almost exclusively - these products feel like Hasbro's cost-savings efforts trying to keep a dying line alive, not the vibrant offerings we normally have. I'm wondering if it's partly that these were all greenlit when tariffs were making everything go haywire and Hasbro got really conservative?
We do have Toyfaire incoming very shortly and there are supposed to be new reveals there. So perhaps they're saving those for the bigger fanfare of a show.Can we talk about the team revealing only ONE new character yesterday? Muse was the ONLY ONE who doesn't have a figure - okay, Throg counts, but come on - where have all the new characters gone?
Amen!Can we talk about the team revealing only ONE new character yesterday? Muse was the ONLY ONE who doesn't have a figure - okay, Throg counts, but come on - where have all the new characters gone?
A LOT of things were cost effective 4 decades ago that aren't anymore. It would not surprise me at all if lenticular stuff has gone up the way a lot of other production stuff has.I wonder how much those lenticular inserts cost. Heard a rumor that holograms weren't cost effective anymore. Both of which seem weird considering they were cost effective 40 years ago.![]()
I don't think they'd be doing them if they were cost-prohibitive. They know they're not a figure-seller. It's likely they're cheaper than traditional accessories and that's why they do it. The fact that they're callbacks to the original line is how they get away with it.I wonder how much those lenticular inserts cost. Heard a rumor that holograms weren't cost effective anymore. Both of which seem weird considering they were cost effective 40 years ago.![]()
I customized a ton back in the day, sculpted a lot and was particular to certain artists. I had to really study figures and learned a lot taking them apart. It's interesting reading or hearing other comments, no offense meant, because this figure is not remotely the one from 2012. Of course it looks the same because it's the same costume based on Oliver Coipel's work. People thought Maximum Deadpoon was from 2016 or didn't appreciate the fidelity to McFarlane on that figure. idk maybe it's just different priorities - I like art and unique toolings, others just like adding characters or focus only on head sculpts etc.You being a customizer back in the day on the FWOOSH know more about bodies and such so I will take you word on it. It just looks real similar to that body. The hand shapes, upper arm sculpt. the bald head without the hair on top because I took the helmet off one of mine and that head sculpt looks real similar. The big kicker the ML team not mentioning anything about being on a new body. Furthermore we don't need another oversize Thor. Thor should be in-scale with the new body Thor figures we have now.
I think I dated her in my mid-twenties.Maximum Deadpoon
Wang dang Deadpoon tangI think I dated her in my mid-twenties.
I don't think they knew that when the lines were greenlit. It's still a material cost in plastic and a mold cost for tooling even if lenticular isn't expensive. There was nothing stopping them from just using that space and filling it with other accessories at lower cost (hands for example). I think they took a swing on some nostalgia bait and missed, but now have to make up the tooling costs so they can't just ditch it out of the waves that are still coming.They know they're not a figure-seller.
*thinks wistfully about Polaroid film*A LOT of things were cost effective 4 decades ago that aren't anymore. It would not surprise me at all if lenticular stuff has gone up the way a lot of other production stuff has.