Agreed. Having things scale with existing lines will help sell these. Classified and Marvel Legends seem the most logical things to scale this to in 6”. Introducing something that people can add to their active collections now rather than vintage or vintage scaled lines seems to help gain interest too. People like vintage Joe no doubt but Classified is the belle at the ball right now and even BigBadWorkshop is leaning more that way with scalability rather than the 3 3/4” linesAs the biggest 18th dork on these and many other boards; that may not be the best business plan. Whatever my, your, and everybody's opinion of the wasteful stupidity of 6in figures; they are unquestionably where the market is these days. I'd talk to Jason Bienvenu (Spero Toys/Animal Warriors of the Kingdom) about the difficulties of starting with 18th and transitioning to 12th. He would be able to give you solid numbers on it, but the evidence is everywhere from Star Wars to EAGLE Force: 18th ain't where the profit is. Skeletron look to be the only people nailing the divide; but they did it by focusing on the vehicle first and made it compatible with both scales. Without that inter-compatibility and vehicle/playset support the cost of 18th manufacture versus the price people will pay doesn't look to be profitable.
Dammit.
Thank you for your thoughts on this. We are scaling with the current 1/18th lines.Agreed. Having things scale with existing lines will help sell these. Classified and Marvel Legends seem the most logical things to scale this to in 6”. Introducing something that people can add to their active collections now rather than vintage or vintage scaled lines seems to help gain interest too. People like vintage Joe no doubt but Classified is the belle at the ball right now and even BigBadWorkshop is leaning more that way with scalability rather than the 3 3/4” lines
I didn't think so. Or I wouldn't have given any advice at all. If you're fairly new to the action figure space, though, there's some stuff up there that maybe you didn't consider from those of us that have a very much 'been there, done that' attitude toward Kickstarters. Especially from people that seemed like they were over-promising. If you can clarify some of those things for next time, I think it will help a lot to get that extra bit of consumer confidence you need to push you over, for sure.I am not trying to trick or fool anyone and run off with cash.
A lot of this is going to be future concepting for investors. I will try to avoid returning to crowdfunding if possible for the rest of the characters. Yes I am partnered with Loosecollector.My mind as a consumer:
I don't know the property. Ironically, as a child of the '80s, the toys aren't even the gateway into making me look into the property.
So that's a strike.
What would get me to look into it is if it's just a cool toy. But the scaling is a potential strike.
However, I do like couple 1/18 lines, like JoyToy and Acid Rain World. To me, the point of 1/18 scale is World building.
One dude is not enough. Especially with no faith that there is a world to build out. I flipped through the website and looked at the other characters in the comic and I'm curious what the plan would be to get the rest of the roster out, especially a female character and a villain to beat down.
Those are my thoughts as someone who scrolls every single third-party toy store looking to burn my paycheck nightly.
I don't remember if you were partnered with loose collector or executive replicas or both. Without a crowdfund, is there any way this line could still exist?
Thanks, I did not want to overpromise which is why I started with one main figure and the army builders. This is just to get started and see where else things can go.I didn't think so. Or I wouldn't have given any advice at all. If you're fairly new to the action figure space, though, there's some stuff up there that maybe you didn't consider from those of us that have a very much 'been there, done that' attitude toward Kickstarters. Especially from people that seemed like they were over-promising. If you can clarify some of those things for next time, I think it will help a lot to get that extra bit of consumer confidence you need to push you over, for sure.
Yes. That will be in motion next year.Without a crowdfund, is there any way this line could still exist?
Piggy-backing, but this in particular is a big red flag for someone like me. If the stretch goals are beneath your funding goal, that means that, reasonably, they are just part of the package. If you fund at all they should all get made anyway, so why not list them as accessories? Kickstarter is an all-or-nothing platform. Stretch goals costing less than the baseline for production implies this is being thought of more like crowdfund sites where there is no minimum bar to clear. Since some of the stretches rely on a figure to be worth anything (head packs and such) it seems backwards to have them arranged this way.Why are there Stretch Goals set at lower values than the base funding level? The whole idea of a 'stretch' goal is a goal for after you have achieved baseline funding.
Understood, I will make the correction.Piggy-backing, but this in particular is a big red flag for someone like me. If the stretch goals are beneath your funding goal, that means that, reasonably, they are just part of the package. If you fund at all they should all get made anyway, so why not list them as accessories? Kickstarter is an all-or-nothing platform. Stretch goals costing less than the baseline for production implies this is being thought of more like crowdfund sites where there is no minimum bar to clear. Since some of the stretches rely on a figure to be worth anything (head packs and such) it seems backwards to have them arranged this way.
Like, the best analogy I can see for this is if someone said "hey want to see my new boat?" and then showed you a port-a-potty. You would fear this person doesn't understand what the word "boat" means. And since this regards the direct funding markers for the project, it gives the impression someone has no clue how much money they need or where it's actually going. At the minimum, it implies someone hasn't actually used kickstarter before and hasn't researched how it works, isn't modeling their fundraising on any proven models and, like Damien said, is just winging it.
And we've all seen folks just wing it on kickstarters for toys. It ends really badly, and especially so for the creators. The community generally won't give second chances, just ask the Army Alphas guy.