I don't think that's how it works, though, is it? Don't you have to pledge a minimum of 10 dollars to 20 campaigns in a single year for that? Still a very low threshold, but I don't think it's as low as 'give literally 20 dollars per year.'
you’re right, $10 for 25 funded campaigns.
I don't disagree on any point. Actually, I don't think 'super backer' should even be a thing. I literally do not care how many things you've backed or at what value. It has absolutely no bearing on the value of your opinions or you as a person. But if you are going to have some kind of ego-stroke title like that, spending 250 bucks in an entire year is a pretty low bar when, yeah, most of us will spend more than that on a single campaign for toys.
Me too. I skipped the first Kickstarter but they got me with the Man-At-Arms orc that I thought looked cool. I threw a Bronze Dwarf onto the order to check it out and because it was $25 or whatever and ended up liking that a lot more than the orc.Cookie Monster orc is a lot to ask Dek..
It's funny - the homages is what made me notice this line in the first place, but the non homage knights are the ones that I actually like enough to buy currently.
I actually forgot to even open them til you asked, but I just unboxed them and honestly, as someone who runs a LOT of 5e? I could drop these cards into a game without any additional prep. The NPC cards are a little busy, but that's kind of a hallmark of Pathfinder and early 5e, and the Heraldic Marks aren't game changers or anything, but they actually try to give some flavor to the characters and setting with it - Who-Man having a "promethean sword" to explain the hot-metal look of it, giving the Frazetta warrior an attack using his shield, it's actually got some thoughtful if not complex game mechanics to it.