joshsquash729
Born on the cob
I know Firefly has mostly been moved on from in this discussion, but I just gotta echo the love for it and how badly it was screwed over. Talk about an expansive world rich with stories. Could've gone on for ages if they let it; heck, it's been getting comics and books fairly consistently spanning all the way back to 2005- there's obviously love for the property and characters. I actually rewatched Serenity on a flight not too long ago, and I think it holds up. It definitely speeds through things- not so much "leaf on the wind" but "leaf in the middle of a hurricane". We really needed more time with the characters- old and new. Mr. Universe? Fanty and Mingo? The Operative? All fun characters that needed more to do. And like others have said, there's just no way you would've gotten the story if you hadn't seen the show, so it had all factors working against it. But if you like the show and haven't given the comics a try, I'd recommend them. Some fans argue more for the Dark Horse run, others for the Boom! Comics run. Along with the books, they do fill in some of the unanswered questions we were all left with.
As for the ending discussion, I generally think that a bad ending doesn't ruin a good show, at least for me. It's like throwing up after a sumptuous feast. You still enjoyed the feast, even if it ended kind of badly, and now you know for next time maybe not to gorge yourself quite as much. Game of Thrones, for instance- there's still some amazing, iconic episodes that I don't think are ruined by the ending (then again, I don't necessarily hate the ending itself- I do think it's generally where everyone would've ended up, more or less, they just took out like a half season or more of the necessary setup, but that's a different discussion). Same with Lost- a lot of folks were disappointed by the ending, but I liked it, and think it added a whole other angle to the show I hadn't really considered. I don't think Breaking Bad would be considered a bad show if they hadn't stuck the landing, because the rest of it was so strong. But I don't begrudge anyone for disliking any of those endings; I'm an easy person to please to a fault. In my mind, the only way for something to really "ruin" the ending is when they basically disregard what came before it in favor of something totally new, like, say The Rise of Skywalker. As long as there's thought and care and effort put into something, I'm generally okay with it, but when it's just sped through (like Daenerys), that's when it sours a bit for me.
As for the ending discussion, I generally think that a bad ending doesn't ruin a good show, at least for me. It's like throwing up after a sumptuous feast. You still enjoyed the feast, even if it ended kind of badly, and now you know for next time maybe not to gorge yourself quite as much. Game of Thrones, for instance- there's still some amazing, iconic episodes that I don't think are ruined by the ending (then again, I don't necessarily hate the ending itself- I do think it's generally where everyone would've ended up, more or less, they just took out like a half season or more of the necessary setup, but that's a different discussion). Same with Lost- a lot of folks were disappointed by the ending, but I liked it, and think it added a whole other angle to the show I hadn't really considered. I don't think Breaking Bad would be considered a bad show if they hadn't stuck the landing, because the rest of it was so strong. But I don't begrudge anyone for disliking any of those endings; I'm an easy person to please to a fault. In my mind, the only way for something to really "ruin" the ending is when they basically disregard what came before it in favor of something totally new, like, say The Rise of Skywalker. As long as there's thought and care and effort put into something, I'm generally okay with it, but when it's just sped through (like Daenerys), that's when it sours a bit for me.